model ai governance framework
Navigating AI Policy Landscapes: Insights into Human Rights Considerations Across IEEE Regions
John, Angel Mary, Panachakel, Jerrin Thomas, P, Anusha S.
This paper explores the integration of human rights considerations into AI regulatory frameworks across different IEEE regions - specifically the United States (Region 1-6), Europe (Region 8), China (part of Region 10), and Singapore (part of Region 10). While all acknowledge the transformative potential of AI and the necessity of ethical guidelines, their regulatory approaches significantly differ. Europe exhibits a rigorous framework with stringent protections for individual rights, while the U.S. promotes innovation with less restrictive regulations. China emphasizes state control and societal order in its AI strategies. In contrast, Singapore's advisory framework encourages self-regulation and aligns closely with international norms. This comparative analysis underlines the need for ongoing global dialogue to harmonize AI regulations that safeguard human rights while promoting technological advancement, reflecting the diverse perspectives and priorities of each region.
- Law > Civil Rights & Constitutional Law (1.00)
- Government > Regional Government > North America Government > United States Government (0.94)
- Government > Regional Government > Asia Government (0.69)
- Health & Medicine > Diagnostic Medicine > Imaging (0.68)
How will Singapore ensure responsible AI use?
Since 2019, government-sponsored initiatives around AI have proliferated across Asia Pacific. Such initiatives include the setting up of cross-domain AI ethics councils, guidelines and frameworks for the responsible use of AI, and other initiatives such as financial and technology support. The majority of these initiatives builds on the country's respective data privacy and protection acts. This is a clear sign that governments see the need to expand existing regulations when it comes to leveraging AI as a key driver for digital economies. All initiatives to date are voluntary in nature, but there are indications already that existing data privacy and protection laws will be updated and expanded to include AI.
Singapore And World Economic Forum Driving AI Adoption And Innovation - dotlah!
Fifteen global companies have taken up Singapore's AI Model Governance Framework; Practical examples for organisations to follow suit. Singapore sees Artificial Intelligence ("AI") as an important and fundamental technology for the Digital Economy, with AI-powered products offering a level of personalised service at scale that was previously unimaginable. In the global discourse on AI ethics and governance issue, Singapore believes that its balanced approach can facilitate innovation, safeguard consumer interests, and serve as a common global reference point. These initiatives follow Singapore's launch of the Model AI Governance Framework in Davos in 2019, as well as the announcement of Singapore's National AI Strategy in November 2019, and demonstrate the progress made in supporting organisations in deploying responsible AI. The new initiatives were announced by Mr S Iswaran, Singapore's Minister for Communications and Information, and Ms Kay Firth-Butterfield, AI Portfolio Lead at the World Economic Forum, at a joint press conference with the WEF's Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution ("WEF C4IR") at WEF's Annual Meeting in Davos.
A Proposed Model AI Governance Framework
The PDPC presents the first edition of a Model AI Governance Framework (Model Framework) - an accountability-based framework to help chart the language and frame the discussions around harnessing AI in a responsible way. The Model Framework translates ethical principles into practical measures that can be implemented by organisations deploying AI solutions at scale. Through the Model Framework, we aim to promote AI adoption while building consumer confidence and trust in providing their personal data for AI. We encourage organisations to use this Model Framework for internal discussion and implementation. Trade associations and chambers professional bodies and interest groups are welcome to use this document for their discussions, and adapt it for their own use.